Skip to main content

Watch our latest video: "2Q2023 Market Review and Outlook for 2023"

The White House on a beautiful summer day Washington DC

Political Party Affiliation Impacts Return on Investment, For Better and For Worse

Photo of author, Will Carter, JD.
Will Carter, JD
Senior Advisor

When helping clients design an investment strategy, I often find it helpful to discuss two very different types of fundamental forces that determine whether stock markets go up or down.

The first, and most reliable, has to do with company profitability. Simply put, all other things being equal, companies that make more profits than anticipated by investors will see their stock price rise. The reverse is true for companies with profits that are lower than investors expected.

The second fundamental force driving stock markets is investor behavior. If people feel more confident, or see everyone else making money in the market and want to join the party, stocks will likely rise even when not supported by increased profits.

More often than not, stock markets do rise. Since 1928 the S&P 500 index of stock prices has risen during nearly 60% of the months, nearly 70% of the calendar years, over 85% of the 5-year periods, and nearly 95% of the ten-year periods.

Accordingly, anything that contributes to a person’s optimism is likely to correspond to increased participation in the market, which is likely to produce positive returns for that person. And the reverse is true for developments that make a person pessimistic about the future.

As another presidential election looms, it is worth considering how political developments might affect your behavior.

In 2012, some professors looked at this factor and determined that investors whose political party was in power performed measurably better each year than their counterparts. This was true for investors in both political parties.

The difference was not in the unique macro-economic policies of their favored party, but rather when the political climate was aligned with investors’ political identity, investors increased allocations to riskier assets, which on average, boosted their returns.

The lesson of the report is to think twice before allowing disappointment in elections to cause you to move out of higher-growth potential investments. The odds are high that if you are a long-term investor, such a move will compound your misery, complementing poor performance of your political party with poor performance in your investment portfolio.

Related Insights
HUDDLE Investment Blog Banner Image

The Fed vs. the Consumer

Since the Federal Reserve began raising interest rates in March of 2022, there has been a pitched battle of “chicken” between the Fed and the average consumer. The Fed began raising rates about a year after inflation started a dramatic climb to its highest level in some 41 years. Those rate hikes have amounted to five percentage points on the Fed's benchmark to a level not seen since 2007. As a result, all sorts of loans tied to short-term interest rates have skyrocketed. These include credit card rates, home equity lines of credit, car loans, personal loans, and business loans.

The Fed has done its best to force higher borrowing rates on individuals and corporations in the hope that meaningful layoffs will follow, thus driving inflation down over time by lessening demand for products and services. What the Fed did not count on was the resilience of the U.S. consumer, who is experiencing solid wage growth and continues to spend on travel and dining out. Learn more about 2Q2023 and what may be ahead in remainder of 2023.

Read More
Goal Post Photo copy

Moving the Goal Posts – When Will it Stop?

The S&P 500 ended the first quarter of 2023 with a solid gain as hopes for an economic “soft landing” gave confidence to investors that enough damage had been done to stock prices in 2022 and that the Federal Reserve would soon stop moving the interest rate “goal posts.” However, stock and bond markets were volatile during the period as investors wrestled with the Fed’s ongoing proclamations regarding the timing and magnitude of further interest rate hikes. Despite the biggest bank failures since the financial crisis taking place during the quarter, Fed Chair Jerome Powell maintained his hawkish position regarding inflation and the need to further tighten financial conditions to curb consumer demand for goods and services. Read more from Senior Investment Strategist Dave Nolan on his 1Q2023 market recap and what may lie ahead in the remainder of 2023.

Read More
Banner Image DPN article copy USE

2022 Was Awful for Stocks and Bonds – What Now?

Easing inflation pressures and a resolution of the fiscal turmoil in the United Kingdom fueled a strong rally in stocks and bonds early in the fourth quarter, but hawkish Fed guidance, disappointing economic data, and rising global bond yields weighed on markets in December and the S&P 500 finished the fourth quarter with only modest gains that capped the worst year for the index since 2008. Learn more about 2022, what actions we took on McKinley Carter portfolios, and our outlook for 2023.

Read More
Play