Skip to main content

Check out our 2Q2021 Investment Update Video + Blog!

The White House on a beautiful summer day Washington DC

Political Party Affiliation Impacts Return on Investment, For Better and For Worse

Photo of author, Will Carter, JD.
Will Carter, JD
Senior Advisor

When helping clients design an investment strategy, I often find it helpful to discuss two very different types of fundamental forces that determine whether stock markets go up or down.

The first, and most reliable, has to do with company profitability. Simply put, all other things being equal, companies that make more profits than anticipated by investors will see their stock price rise. The reverse is true for companies with profits that are lower than investors expected.

The second fundamental force driving stock markets is investor behavior. If people feel more confident, or see everyone else making money in the market and want to join the party, stocks will likely rise even when not supported by increased profits.

More often than not, stock markets do rise. Since 1928 the S&P 500 index of stock prices has risen during nearly 60% of the months, nearly 70% of the calendar years, over 85% of the 5-year periods, and nearly 95% of the ten-year periods.

Accordingly, anything that contributes to a person’s optimism is likely to correspond to increased participation in the market, which is likely to produce positive returns for that person. And the reverse is true for developments that make a person pessimistic about the future.

As another presidential election looms, it is worth considering how political developments might affect your behavior.

In 2012, some professors looked at this factor and determined that investors whose political party was in power performed measurably better each year than their counterparts. This was true for investors in both political parties.

The difference was not in the unique macro-economic policies of their favored party, but rather when the political climate was aligned with investors’ political identity, investors increased allocations to riskier assets, which on average, boosted their returns.

The lesson of the report is to think twice before allowing disappointment in elections to cause you to move out of higher-growth potential investments. The odds are high that if you are a long-term investor, such a move will compound your misery, complementing poor performance of your political party with poor performance in your investment portfolio.

Related Insights
I Stock 119135127 DPN FINA Limage 800px

A Goldilocks Economy Sends Stocks to New Highs — Will the Bears Have the Last Laugh?

Looking back, the S&P 500 had a strong second quarter thanks to numerous positive developments that led to a “Goldilocks” economic environment. We dig deeper into performance and outline the actions we took in McKinley Carter portfolios, plus provide an outlook for the remainder of 2021.

Read More
Jamie street Nv W y2s O Jtc unsplash DPN article crop for CRAFT

The Light at the End of the Tunnel: Stimulus and Vaccine Optimism Power Markets Higher

The first quarter of 2021 was marked by several macro- and micro-economic surprises that resulted in increased market volatility compared to the fourth quarter of 2020, but additional economic stimulus combined with accelerating COVID-19 vaccine distribution and a decline in coronavirus cases helped stocks start the new year with solid gains. Take a look back with us at the first quarter of 2021. Review what actions we took on client portfolios as market dynamics changed. And learn what we expect for this year in our 2021 economic outlook.

Read More
FYI Sustainable Investing blog Image

Sustainable Investing: What It Could Mean for Your Portfolio

This is the first in a two-part series of blogs around Sustainable Investing. Here, we review the origins of Sustainable Investing and define what ESG means from a portfolio perspective.

Read More
Play