Skip to main content

Watch our latest video: "2Q2023 Market Review and Outlook for 2023"

Election Huddle

Managing Election Day Anxieties about Your Investments

Photo of author, Will Carter, JD.
Will Carter, JD
Senior Advisor

Many people have asked me in recent weeks whether they should be making changes to their investment portfolios as a result of recent developments in the presidential election.

Some have raised the question because, as Donald Trump’s chances of winning tomorrow’s election have improved since mid October (from roughly 15% to as high as 35%), stock markets have declined (roughly 3%) over the same period. Moreover, during a recent National Public Radio interview with a couple of academic economists, it was suggested that stocks could sell off as much as 15% if Trump is elected.

Others have wondered if portfolios should be adjusted because of the possibility of social unrest and potential ongoing political gridlock that could follow a Clinton victory.

Whatever their political persuasion, they are typically dissatisfied with my answer, which is “It depends.”

So here are some thoughts that can help you assess whether the uncertainty around the election should trigger changes to your investments.

In short, if your investments (a) are appropriately diversified and (b) subject you to no more short-term losses than your emotions and need for cash can handle, then you may not need to make any changes. However, if you are not sure whether you meet this two-pronged test, then you should use Election Day anxieties as an overdue prompt to evaluate your investment strategy and consider making adjustments.

There are two simple reasons — one long-term and one short-term —that you may not need to make any changes if you are sure your investment portfolio passes my test. It starts with understanding the fundamental reason that stocks increase in value — namely, long-term growth in corporate profits. Though stocks may slump and stall for a while if Trump is elected due to uncertainty, his ensuing policies and pronouncements are not likely to produce a meaningful reduction in the long-term profits of publicly-traded corporations. Indeed, there are substantial portions of the market ( and health care stocks) that may rise if Trump is elected.

Some of you may think they are smart enough to make money trading into major geo-political developments, even though research suggests that approach is likely to fail. But you have to wonder about the wisdom of betting against a result that experts say has a 65%-85% likelihood of occurring (i.e. a Clinton victory) — a development that will likely result in a short-term increase in stock values.

On the other hand, readers who are unsure if their portfolios are sufficiently diversified and would provide enough protection against dropping markets should ask themselves whether their investments are sufficiently designed to “expect the unexpected” from geo-political developments. If not, use this as a call for action.

One way to assess this is to estimate how much your current portfolio would have dropped during the Great Recession back in 2008-09, when stocks on average dropped over 50%.

For example, consider what might happen if you have 80% of your portfolio invested in stocks, which is not an uncommon allocation. If a 40% decline in the value of your portfolio would cause financial problems, such as forcing you to sell stocks when they are low to raise cash needed to support your lifestyle, or cause lost sleep at night, then you should use the uncertainty of this specific geo-political event to adjust the risk and return attributes of your investment portfolio. Consider for instance, increasing your allocation to investments (e.g.U.S. government bonds or funds that “short” the stock market) that will do relatively well during market sell-offs.

How much is enough to have in more stable investments — those that do relatively well during periods of anxiety — depends on your specific situation. For instance, if you rely on distributions from your investments to support your lifestyle, you might want to have several years’ worth of distributions in securities expected to hold their value during stock market declines. Similarly, whether or not sharp drops in stock market values threaten your day-to-day financial cash flow needs, you should also consider increasing your allocation to more stable investments if short-term volatility creates such psychological stress that it interferes with your peace of mind,, foregoing some upside growth potential for the sake of greater stability.

There are other ways to decrease downside risk by assessing how you have structured the portion of your investments allocated to stocks. For instance, make sure you do not have too much allocated to certain companies or industry sectors that might be adversely affected by shifts in political winds. You may also want to focus on stocks that have produced consistent earnings growth, allocating less into stocks that have greater fluctuations in earnings.

The ultimate effect of these and other strategies to insulate yourself from the ever-present risk of political surprises is that your portfolios should do better than average in declining markets. This also means, however, that when markets roar up, your portfolio will generally grow at a more moderate pace. If this trade-off sounds good to you, you may want to move now, while stocks are still close to all-time highs.

In summary, this unusually contentious election season may produce more short-term stock market volatility and psychic distress than usual. If you are sure your investments already have enough in relatively stable investments to avoid financial or emotional stresses in the event of post-election declines following the election, then you can probably worry about other aspects of the election beyond your investment portfolio.

If not, consider the election to be a call for action to take better care of your own financial future, even as you contemplate the impact of Election Day on our country as a whole.

Related Insights
HUDDLE Investment Blog Banner Image

The Fed vs. the Consumer

Since the Federal Reserve began raising interest rates in March of 2022, there has been a pitched battle of “chicken” between the Fed and the average consumer. The Fed began raising rates about a year after inflation started a dramatic climb to its highest level in some 41 years. Those rate hikes have amounted to five percentage points on the Fed's benchmark to a level not seen since 2007. As a result, all sorts of loans tied to short-term interest rates have skyrocketed. These include credit card rates, home equity lines of credit, car loans, personal loans, and business loans.

The Fed has done its best to force higher borrowing rates on individuals and corporations in the hope that meaningful layoffs will follow, thus driving inflation down over time by lessening demand for products and services. What the Fed did not count on was the resilience of the U.S. consumer, who is experiencing solid wage growth and continues to spend on travel and dining out. Learn more about 2Q2023 and what may be ahead in remainder of 2023.

Read More
Goal Post Photo copy

Moving the Goal Posts – When Will it Stop?

The S&P 500 ended the first quarter of 2023 with a solid gain as hopes for an economic “soft landing” gave confidence to investors that enough damage had been done to stock prices in 2022 and that the Federal Reserve would soon stop moving the interest rate “goal posts.” However, stock and bond markets were volatile during the period as investors wrestled with the Fed’s ongoing proclamations regarding the timing and magnitude of further interest rate hikes. Despite the biggest bank failures since the financial crisis taking place during the quarter, Fed Chair Jerome Powell maintained his hawkish position regarding inflation and the need to further tighten financial conditions to curb consumer demand for goods and services. Read more from Senior Investment Strategist Dave Nolan on his 1Q2023 market recap and what may lie ahead in the remainder of 2023.

Read More
Banner Image DPN article copy USE

2022 Was Awful for Stocks and Bonds – What Now?

Easing inflation pressures and a resolution of the fiscal turmoil in the United Kingdom fueled a strong rally in stocks and bonds early in the fourth quarter, but hawkish Fed guidance, disappointing economic data, and rising global bond yields weighed on markets in December and the S&P 500 finished the fourth quarter with only modest gains that capped the worst year for the index since 2008. Learn more about 2022, what actions we took on McKinley Carter portfolios, and our outlook for 2023.

Read More