Skip to main content

Check out our 2Q2024 Market Review and Investment Outlook for the remainder of 2024

Election Huddle

Managing Election Day Anxieties about Your Investments

Photo of author, Will Carter, JD.
Will Carter, JD
Senior Advisor

Many people have asked me in recent weeks whether they should be making changes to their investment portfolios as a result of recent developments in the presidential election.

Some have raised the question because, as Donald Trump’s chances of winning tomorrow’s election have improved since mid October (from roughly 15% to as high as 35%), stock markets have declined (roughly 3%) over the same period. Moreover, during a recent National Public Radio interview with a couple of academic economists, it was suggested that stocks could sell off as much as 15% if Trump is elected.

Others have wondered if portfolios should be adjusted because of the possibility of social unrest and potential ongoing political gridlock that could follow a Clinton victory.

Whatever their political persuasion, they are typically dissatisfied with my answer, which is “It depends.”

So here are some thoughts that can help you assess whether the uncertainty around the election should trigger changes to your investments.

In short, if your investments (a) are appropriately diversified and (b) subject you to no more short-term losses than your emotions and need for cash can handle, then you may not need to make any changes. However, if you are not sure whether you meet this two-pronged test, then you should use Election Day anxieties as an overdue prompt to evaluate your investment strategy and consider making adjustments.

There are two simple reasons — one long-term and one short-term —that you may not need to make any changes if you are sure your investment portfolio passes my test. It starts with understanding the fundamental reason that stocks increase in value — namely, long-term growth in corporate profits. Though stocks may slump and stall for a while if Trump is elected due to uncertainty, his ensuing policies and pronouncements are not likely to produce a meaningful reduction in the long-term profits of publicly-traded corporations. Indeed, there are substantial portions of the market ( and health care stocks) that may rise if Trump is elected.

Some of you may think they are smart enough to make money trading into major geo-political developments, even though research suggests that approach is likely to fail. But you have to wonder about the wisdom of betting against a result that experts say has a 65%-85% likelihood of occurring (i.e. a Clinton victory) — a development that will likely result in a short-term increase in stock values.

On the other hand, readers who are unsure if their portfolios are sufficiently diversified and would provide enough protection against dropping markets should ask themselves whether their investments are sufficiently designed to “expect the unexpected” from geo-political developments. If not, use this as a call for action.

One way to assess this is to estimate how much your current portfolio would have dropped during the Great Recession back in 2008-09, when stocks on average dropped over 50%.

For example, consider what might happen if you have 80% of your portfolio invested in stocks, which is not an uncommon allocation. If a 40% decline in the value of your portfolio would cause financial problems, such as forcing you to sell stocks when they are low to raise cash needed to support your lifestyle, or cause lost sleep at night, then you should use the uncertainty of this specific geo-political event to adjust the risk and return attributes of your investment portfolio. Consider for instance, increasing your allocation to investments (e.g.U.S. government bonds or funds that “short” the stock market) that will do relatively well during market sell-offs.

How much is enough to have in more stable investments — those that do relatively well during periods of anxiety — depends on your specific situation. For instance, if you rely on distributions from your investments to support your lifestyle, you might want to have several years’ worth of distributions in securities expected to hold their value during stock market declines. Similarly, whether or not sharp drops in stock market values threaten your day-to-day financial cash flow needs, you should also consider increasing your allocation to more stable investments if short-term volatility creates such psychological stress that it interferes with your peace of mind,, foregoing some upside growth potential for the sake of greater stability.

There are other ways to decrease downside risk by assessing how you have structured the portion of your investments allocated to stocks. For instance, make sure you do not have too much allocated to certain companies or industry sectors that might be adversely affected by shifts in political winds. You may also want to focus on stocks that have produced consistent earnings growth, allocating less into stocks that have greater fluctuations in earnings.

The ultimate effect of these and other strategies to insulate yourself from the ever-present risk of political surprises is that your portfolios should do better than average in declining markets. This also means, however, that when markets roar up, your portfolio will generally grow at a more moderate pace. If this trade-off sounds good to you, you may want to move now, while stocks are still close to all-time highs.

In summary, this unusually contentious election season may produce more short-term stock market volatility and psychic distress than usual. If you are sure your investments already have enough in relatively stable investments to avoid financial or emotional stresses in the event of post-election declines following the election, then you can probably worry about other aspects of the election beyond your investment portfolio.

If not, consider the election to be a call for action to take better care of your own financial future, even as you contemplate the impact of Election Day on our country as a whole.

Related Insights
I Stock 155234503 DPN 3 Q2024 Huddle

The Few. The Proud. The Elephants.

While "The Few, The Proud, The Marines" is a recruiting slogan for the U.S. Marine Corps, in the stock market, the “Few and the Proud” have been the “Magnificent 7” stocks (Nvidia, Apple, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Meta, and Tesla) and their performance reminds one of the stampeding effects of charging elephants. Like these large pachyderms, the “Mag 7” have run roughshod over the broad stock market this year and have left most other stocks lagging far behind. Much of the excitement surrounding these companies is focused on their dominance in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) investment landscape. Learn more about our 2Q2024 market review.

Read More
3d rendering humanoid robot analyze stock market 493806 6172

A.I.: Rise of the Markets

In the Terminator movie franchise, the third installment was titled Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines and continued the original movie’s theme of how the growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI) would ultimately lead to the end of civilization, as AI would discover that it no longer had need of humans. Fortunately, as AI is still in its infancy, the stock market is pricing in only the positive aspects of the technology. While graphic chips provider Nvidia (up 82% in Q1) has served as the poster child for Artificial Intelligence investments, many other technology companies (such as Super Micro Computer – up 255% in Q1) with some connection, or perceived connection, to AI rallied strongly in the first quarter. This led to an overall positive market sentiment throughout the period that lifted the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ 100 higher.

Ultimately, we believe the most powerful trend in AI will be the productivity enhancements experienced by many companies across a wide swath of industries. Read more about our thoughts on market trends and our look ahead to the remainder of 2024.

Read More
Elvis Banner Image

Elvis Has Left the Building – Has the Fed Declared Mission Accomplished?

"Elvis has left the building" is a phrase that was often used by public address announcers at the conclusion of Elvis Presley concerts in order to disperse audiences who lingered in hopes of an encore.

With that in mind, we believe that Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has strongly hinted that when it comes to the Fed’s rate-hiking cycle that began in March of 2022, Elvis (future rate hikes) has now “left the building.”

Read more about Senior Investment Strategist Dave Nolan's 4Q2023 market review and what may be ahead for 2024.

Read More