Skip to main content

Check out our 3Q2021 Market Review & Outlook Video + Blog!

Election Huddle

2016 Presidential Election: Predicting Markets, Election Results

Many clients are concerned about how the upcoming election results might impact their portfolios. Markets, over the long-term, are mostly moved by fundamentals, economic outlook, and, for the time being, central bank policies. We continue to assert that our clients’ investment decisions are best met by assessing and respecting longer term goals, and avoiding current events. In the spirit of the imminent election and its aftermath, we’ll explore a few thoughts regarding predicting markets and election results.

Before getting to the meat of this, we offer a modest and trivial digression to a disturbing bit of news scrawled across the cable news programs recently. Apparently, only one in five Millennials have ever had a Big Mac. Digesting this, in context of elections, suggests that a future U.S. President will not know about two all-beef patties, special sauce, etc. on a sesame seed bun. Political pundits believe this election, and the consequences for years to come, will be determined by voter turnout. Yet, only one of five millennials voted in the last midterm elections. Whether Big Mac consumption was causal or correlated to the voting turnout is yet unknown.

Change, by its nature, brings uncertainty. Generally speaking, the market prefers political stability. It is fair to say that one Presidential candidate is seen as an agent for change, and the other not. According to Ned Davis Research (for years 1900-2012) on average, financial market gyrations (volatility?) tends to tick up in the weeks preceding elections, and more so in years when the incumbent party is expected to lose. Post-election, the markets tend to rally by year end with either party in the White House. However, on average the markets do much better when the incumbent party wins.

Sure, it would be tremendously helpful to find predictive indicators -- a predictive result would be “because this exists, something will be more likely to happen.” Consider the Super Bowl effect, which measures the likelihood of a positive year in the markets, based upon the team that wins the Super Bowl. There is an 82% association of positive market returns for years when certain NFL teams win the Super Bowl. Of course, there is no relation between football and markets, and this correlation is merely an association and not causal.

But, back to the political parties. Each party claims to be better for business and investments. Can the investor class find investing comfort with one party in the White Houser versus the other? The answer is a resounding “not really.”

Each election cycle, charts are rolled out suggesting which presidential party is better for stock markets, and the benefits of dividing power between the White House and Congress. There are not sufficient data points for these charts to be statistically valid and they are not predictive of how the markets will perform with either party at the top. Frankly, even if political party were scientifically predictive, would the science hold up with this year’s unpredictable outliers especially with the historical high unfavorable ratings for both candidates?

Looking down the road, the voting power of Millennials will likely introduce additional variability, as they are soon to be the largest generation of eligible voters, long held by the baby boomers who may recall the McDonalds ad slogan from the 1970s and 1980s and "deserve a break today.”

Related Insights
DPN blog pic

Post-COVID, Markets Prepare for Transition

The S&P 500 hit new all-time highs again in the third quarter as investors looked past a resurgence of COVID-19 cases in the U.S. and instead focused on the positive combination of a resilient economic recovery, ongoing historic support from the Federal Reserve, and strong corporate earnings. Market volatility did pick up notably during the final few weeks of September however, reminding investors that the transition to a post-pandemic “new normal” isn’t always going to be smooth. We dig deeper into performance and outline the actions we took in McKinley Carter portfolios, plus provide our best-thinking on what's ahead.

Read More
I Stock 119135127 DPN FINA Limage 800px

A Goldilocks Economy Sends Stocks to New Highs — Will the Bears Have the Last Laugh?

Looking back, the S&P 500 had a strong second quarter thanks to numerous positive developments that led to a “Goldilocks” economic environment. We dig deeper into performance and outline the actions we took in McKinley Carter portfolios, plus provide an outlook for the remainder of 2021.

Read More
Jamie street Nv W y2s O Jtc unsplash DPN article crop for CRAFT

The Light at the End of the Tunnel: Stimulus and Vaccine Optimism Power Markets Higher

The first quarter of 2021 was marked by several macro- and micro-economic surprises that resulted in increased market volatility compared to the fourth quarter of 2020, but additional economic stimulus combined with accelerating COVID-19 vaccine distribution and a decline in coronavirus cases helped stocks start the new year with solid gains. Take a look back with us at the first quarter of 2021. Review what actions we took on client portfolios as market dynamics changed. And learn what we expect for this year in our 2021 economic outlook.

Read More
Play