Skip to main content
Election Huddle

2016 Presidential Election: Predicting Markets, Election Results

Many clients are concerned about how the upcoming election results might impact their portfolios. Markets, over the long-term, are mostly moved by fundamentals, economic outlook, and, for the time being, central bank policies. We continue to assert that our clients’ investment decisions are best met by assessing and respecting longer term goals, and avoiding current events. In the spirit of the imminent election and its aftermath, we’ll explore a few thoughts regarding predicting markets and election results.

Before getting to the meat of this, we offer a modest and trivial digression to a disturbing bit of news scrawled across the cable news programs recently. Apparently, only one in five Millennials have ever had a Big Mac. Digesting this, in context of elections, suggests that a future U.S. President will not know about two all-beef patties, special sauce, etc. on a sesame seed bun. Political pundits believe this election, and the consequences for years to come, will be determined by voter turnout. Yet, only one of five millennials voted in the last midterm elections. Whether Big Mac consumption was causal or correlated to the voting turnout is yet unknown.

Change, by its nature, brings uncertainty. Generally speaking, the market prefers political stability. It is fair to say that one Presidential candidate is seen as an agent for change, and the other not. According to Ned Davis Research (for years 1900-2012) on average, financial market gyrations (volatility?) tends to tick up in the weeks preceding elections, and more so in years when the incumbent party is expected to lose. Post-election, the markets tend to rally by year end with either party in the White House. However, on average the markets do much better when the incumbent party wins.

Sure, it would be tremendously helpful to find predictive indicators -- a predictive result would be “because this exists, something will be more likely to happen.” Consider the Super Bowl effect, which measures the likelihood of a positive year in the markets, based upon the team that wins the Super Bowl. There is an 82% association of positive market returns for years when certain NFL teams win the Super Bowl. Of course, there is no relation between football and markets, and this correlation is merely an association and not causal.

But, back to the political parties. Each party claims to be better for business and investments. Can the investor class find investing comfort with one party in the White Houser versus the other? The answer is a resounding “not really.”

Each election cycle, charts are rolled out suggesting which presidential party is better for stock markets, and the benefits of dividing power between the White House and Congress. There are not sufficient data points for these charts to be statistically valid and they are not predictive of how the markets will perform with either party at the top. Frankly, even if political party were scientifically predictive, would the science hold up with this year’s unpredictable outliers especially with the historical high unfavorable ratings for both candidates?

Looking down the road, the voting power of Millennials will likely introduce additional variability, as they are soon to be the largest generation of eligible voters, long held by the baby boomers who may recall the McDonalds ad slogan from the 1970s and 1980s and "deserve a break today.”

Related Insights
DPN blog banner image

After a Prosperous 2024, Who is in Our Circle of Trust for 2025?

In the 2000 film, Meet the Parents, actor Robert De Niro played Jack Byrnes, a retired CIA officer and father to Pam Byrnes, the girlfriend of character Greg Fokker, played by actor Ben Stiller. In the film, Jack Byrnes describes to his potential son-in-law, Greg, the importance of being part of the family’s “Circle of Trust.”

Much like in the movie, we are continually assessing which investments qualify for our “Circle of Trust.” 2024 saw investments related to Artificial Intelligence (AI) as trusted members of that circle. AI investments in semiconductors and software joined power suppliers (think utilities) and power management companies as winners in 2024 as the artificial intelligence theme saw robust investor interest in what is perceived as the next great frontier of investment opportunity. Learn more.

Read More
I Stock 2155150640

Investing During an Election

This was an emotionally charged election season, wasn’t it? Whether you are elated or depressed with the election results, now is an especially important time to make sure you are making investment decisions based on facts rather than emotions.

U.S. presidential elections can cause ripples, and even waves, in the stock market. Like any other event that produces market volatility, changing your investment strategy in response to the political news of the day or the market’s short- term ups and downs have shown to do more harm then good. Here’s a look at how elections impact the market and how
to stay invested for the long-term in spite of short-term volatility.

Read More
Engine 493 DPN Blog

The Revenge of the 493

Markets were volatile in the third quarter as investors faced political turmoil and increased uncertainty about future economic growth, but the return of Fed rate cuts and solid corporate earnings helped to offset those political and economic anxieties, and the S&P 500 hit another new all-time high and finished the quarter with strong gains. In the third quarter, we began to see other stocks (the 493) participate in the stock market’s rise. Learn more.

Read More
Play